Jerusalem 3000 By: Alick Isaacs |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Introduction Jerusalem is a city where every day to day event may take on symbolic significance. There is nothing normal or mundane about life in Jerusalem. It says in the Talmud that Jerusalem is "not divided up among the tribes". Literally the phrase implies two things:
The implication of this statement is that on the pilgrim festivals, when thousands of pilgrims flocked to the city to participate in the festive Temple ritual, acording to the law they were granted free board by the residents of the city. No one owned land in Jerusalem and so no one had the right to claim rent from the pilgrims who came here. Symbolically the phrase suggests that there is something otherworldly about Jerusalem which puts it beyond our reach. We can never own and become masters of the city. There is something about it which has yet to be revealed and which has yet to be fully understood. 1. The Poems of Yehudah Amichai
Amichai suffers from the density of life in Jerusalem. Every recent event is inevitably part of a three thousand year old story which just piles up around the city polluting the atmosphere. He is acutely aware of the symbolism which surrounds every innocent scene. Nothing is without its symbolic context. Imagine a simple day to day scene: Two residents of the city go walking in the hills one is an Arab shepherd searching for a goat the other a Jewish father searching for his son. The simple mundane scene cannot go unnoticed in this city. The description of this simple human story immediately conjurs up associations in the minds of all who witness it:-
Afterward we found them among the bushes and our voices came back inside us, laughing and crying. Searching for a goat or a son has always been the beginning of a new religion in these mountains." It is impossible to avoid the symbolism. Obviously, the scene which Amichai portrays connotes the scene of the sacrifices of Isaac and/or Ishmael. The one scene shared by two cultures which is the essence of each culture and the course of conflict between them. But because of the thousand year old conflict, the father and the shepherd desperately search, hoping to rectify their "temporary failure". The "failure" which is the inability to find the lost one is also symbolic of the state of sin which characterises the imperfect world. We seek to correct this failure in the hills of Jerusalem. Yet the poor father and shepherd are only anxious to find the goat and the child so as to avoid being pulled reluctantly into history. They are wary of the danger of being turned into symbols and being pulled into the "terrible Had Gadya machine" i.e. a destructive and fatal chain of events. They don't want to start a new religion they want to find what they have lost, but Jerusalem won't let them. Amichai writes:-
Normalisation of the city is the new Zionist dream which Amichai believes in. This is the redemption for which he yearns. We have to relieve the residents of the city from the burden they carry as if they were keepers of a big living museum. Forget the Roman arches, the sacrifice of Isaac and the Herodian Temple. Look! there are real living people in Jerusalem, living real lives; little personal dramas which should be allowed to unfold unaffected by history. Notice them and the redemption will come. Amichai's redemption is unloading the burden of the past. But he knows that it cannot be done. It is impossible to escape from the symbols which are an intrinsic part of life in the city. 2. The Contraversial Tunnel - a foothold on the future The city is a future symbol for the end of days. The nation with the strongest foothold in the city is best poised for the future. Each side seeks recognition of its cause and vindicated before God of its version of the truth. Without Jerusalem these dreams may not be fulfilled. 3. Three Themes Summarised In the first lecture I offered three answers to these questions. I suggested that at every critical juncture of the city's history three forces were in operation. First, Jerusalem, the stairway to heaven has always been the focus of Messianic yearning. The city's history is thus a cycle of redemption and destruction. This quality is inherent to the city because of the conviction that God's presence hovers over the Temple Mount. Second, I argued that Jerusalem has always been the meeting place between east and west. The city has always perched on the critical seamline between competing cultures whether Jewish and Assyrian, Roman and Greek, Christian and Moslem or Zionist and Palestinian. Third, I suggested that as the "Capital of Monotheism" Jerusalem's history has been shaped by the yearnings of Jews, Christians and Moslems to prove the ultimate truth by turning the city of Jerusalem into an expression of their faiths: The Jews built a Temple and a State, the Moslems built the Dome of the Rock and the Christians built the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. Some of you perhaps are more convinced by one or two of these themes. Others were perhaps more impressed by one and less of another at different stages along our long journey through time. Needless to say, I feel that all of them are true to a greater or lesser degree throughout the story. I feel that understanding the symbols which have piled up through history, taking on different forms from time to time is an essential tool for living in Jerusalem today. The special quality of life in Jerusalem may only be fully appreciated when one learns to enjoy the symbols and recognise the historic significance of the daily events reported in the news. Every street corner in the city has a story to tell and that is why, to this day the residents of the city are surrounded by pilgrims. They arrive from all over the world searching for something special. Tourists come to the city looking for an educational experience aswell as a holiday. It has been my privilege during the last few years to share some of the stories which I know with tourists and students. And my experience has taught me that however well you tell the story and however much or little you know of Jerusalem, it is never the "teacher" but always the "subject" itself who communicates best. 4. Conclusion
Ten minutes passed before the Jew completed his prayers. He turned to Napoleon and to the Czar, "What do you want from me?" Napoleon replied, "You claimed that you could see Jerusalem from here, I want to know where you were looking." The Jew replied indeed I can see Jerusalem from here can't you?" Napoleon tried the eye-glass again and confessed quite frankly that he could not. To this the Jew replied "Of course you can't see Jerusalem with your eye-glass, are you stupid? We are in Austerlitz, Jerusalem is miles away. If you want to see Jerusalem it doesn't matter where you are in the world all that matters is that you look with an open heart! I tell visitors that the story describes the yearnings of Jewish people to feel near to Jerusalem even when physical access to the city was impossible for them. However, now thousands of people visit the city every year and they need to be told that even if they are here, without opening your heart, it is still impossible to see the city. I don't know how easy it is to see Jerusalem through the internet. I hope that these lectures have perhaps opened up your hearts to the city's magic and to its unique history. It is my hope that equipped with your open hearts you will come to the city and experience first hand the special place, the city which we have spent three months trying to describe. |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||